Does this reproductive system make sense?
23 days ago, I made a post here regarding "Homo vigilans" an alternate version of the human species that fills the place of humanity in my world-building projects.
As detailed in the post, Homo vigilans are illogically gendered hermaphrodites wherein they have both a male and female sex but the difference between their sexes is purely aesthetic and both H.v men and women are capable of becoming pregnant and giving birth.
Someone in the comments informed me that the reproductive system of H.v didn't make a lot of sense so I've spent the past week or so re-developing it.
I wanted some opinions on the new concept I've come up with.
-
To start, H.v have an estrus cycle instead of a menstrual cycle and this means that their bodies re-absorb discarded uterine lining instead of bleeding it out.
Now, an estrus cycle necessitates a "heat cycle". I'll admit that the concept of humans in traditional heat ( insatiably horny for a specific period of time ) is hot but it doesn't work for the stories I want to write.
What I came up with is that H.v heats abide by a system of "silent and irregular poly-estrus". This means that 1. H.v go into heat multiple times a year but 2. Their heats are "silent" and cause no noticeable physical or emotional changes and 3. The time between their heats can fluctuate wildly with individualized environmental and metabolic changes.
This means that H.v cannot reliably track their heats so un-planned pregnancies from random hook-up's with unprotected or poorly protected intercourse are very possible. Some research I did suggests that H.v's irregular and silent heat cycles would need to occur every 60-90 days or 4-6 times a year for them to have population growth comparable to real humans.
-
In addition to this, H.v men almost always suffer from "secondary infertility" after becoming pregnant and giving birth once and H.v females have a naturally low sperm count. As a result, H.v have a historical preference for male + female pairings and they did develop a concept of homophobia but it's much weaker against societal reform compared to real world homophobia.
-
So, what do you think? Does this make sense or does it need more improvement?