u/New-Contact-5670

Yesterday, a 19-year-old sophomore at a local college who had been vocal about his "right" to spank any woman found himself on the wrong end of the belt. After reportedly threatening to spank his older step-sister and her friend for no reason other than "because I am a man", his step-dad decided to intervene and teach him basic empathy. The boy was stripped naked, even past his underwear, and forced to do jumping jacks while the two girls laughed at his bouncing genitalia. He was then spanked and belted, and his backside was captured on a smartphone camera.

Traditionalists are up in arms, flooding the DS with outrage that a male was subjected to disciplinary measures at all. "The rules are explicit, only women may be disciplined within DS premises," argued one longtime member. "This isn't about whether the boy was arrogant or whether his views were distasteful. It's about preserving the fundamental structure of our society. If men can be stripped and shamed like this, where does it end?” Several members have petitioned that the girls be publicly disciplined for laughing and taking photos during the proceedings, and the step-dad have his membership revoked for violating DS traditions.

Progressives, however, are celebrating the step-dad's actions as necessary correction. "This was a direct response to a young man who believed his gender grants him inherent superiority, threatening to punish women without reason, solely for his own pleasure," said one advocate. They note that the step-dad pays the boy's college fees, making him fully dependent and subject to his authority regardless of his male gender. They also propose an amendment that young boys aged 18-24 be subjected to the same humbling measures as women, arguing that experiencing submission firsthand would purge youthful arrogance and turn them into more thoughtful disciplinarians in the future.

The question now is which side you fall on. Do you support the traditionalist view, the progressive view, or something in between?

We can only speculate but:

1. Which public areas do you imagine these devices will be installed in?
2. What crimes should carry this sentence in your view?
3. Do you believe the spring mechanism goes too far?
4. How long do you reckon a typical display will last?
5. Should bystanders be permitted to touch wrongdoers during punishment?
6. Would you prefer nudity to be mandatory, or insertion from under the subject's skirt to be an option as well?

Many citizens have raised concerns regarding these reports. They have the following questions:

1. Where would this documentation take place? Would airports provide private screening rooms or would women be made to strip in open areas?

2. Why are close-up images considered necessary for screening and documentation purposes?

3. Who would have access to these photographs, and for how long are they stored? Many women say they are embarrassed about strangers examining their intimate parts.

4. Why only women? Critics argue that men statistically pose higher security risks and therefore the policy is sexist at its core.

5. What happens to women who refuse to remove their clothing and have photographs taken? Would they only be denied entry/boarding or would they face additional punishment?

6. Can a female examiner be requested or is documentation by whichever staff is assigned mandatory?