
r/NoInnerForeskin

Should the look be improved by a revision to no innerforeskin?
42 male urethral catheterised pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema combined
where to find videos of tight cut guys or newly circumcised struggling to cum or have any pleasure with their cock missing it most sensitive part?
i think circumcion as a denial of pleasure fetish is kinda niche and i find it quite difficult to find any videos of this fetish, even in reddit, you guys should start to posting stuff like that, (im uncut so i cant )
Difference in sexual sensation with and without inner skin
I would like to hear from others who have had sex both with inner skin and then without. How is it different? I was circumcised when I was 22. It was a high and loose circumcision. When soft my glans was partially covered. I was elated to finally be circumcised bit bummed out that it was so loose. After a couple years I went in for a revision to tight. The Doctor gave me a nice tight circumcision but he removed all my inner skin, making the cut right where the moveable shaft skin joins the base of the head.
With my original circumcision I felt two distinct sensations that complemented each other like notes in a musical cord being richer than a single note.
After I was healed I realized not having any inner skin was a major change. The sensation in my glans was almost unbareably intense but many times I wasn’t able to cum and if I did cum orgasm felt hollow and empty compared to what it was when I had an 1 ¼” of inner skin.
I found that my partners really didn’t appreciate a guy who just couldn’t get over the brink and cum. Eventually thay would ask if they could finish me by hand. Sometimes they were successful and sometimes not, leaving me with a raging hard-on that just wouldn’t go down.
As time passed my body gradually learned to cum with my new dick but while sex is good now, it is never as good as it used to be. Does this make sense to anyone? Has anyone else had a similar experience when they lost their inner skin?
Difference in sexual sensation with and without inner skin
I would like to hear from others who have had sex both with inner skin and then without. How is it different? I was circumcised when I was 22. It was a high and loose circumcision. When soft my glans was partially covered. I was elated to finally be circumcised bit bummed out that it was so loose. After a couple years I went in for a revision to tight. The Doctor gave me a nice tight circumcision but he removed all my inner skin, making the cut right where the moveable shaft skin joins the base of the head.
With my original circumcision I felt two distinct sensations that complemented each other like notes in a musical cord being richer than a single note.
After I was healed I realized not having any inner skin was a major change. The sensation in my glans was almost unbareably intense but many times I wasn’t able to cum and if I did cum orgasm felt hollow and empty compared to what it was when I had an 1 ¼” of inner skin.
I found that my partners really didn’t appreciate a guy who just couldn’t get over the brink and cum. Eventually thay would ask if they could finish me by hand. Sometimes they were successful and sometimes not leaving me with a raging hard-on that wouldn’t go down.
As time passed my body gradually learned to cum with my new dick but while sex is good now, it is never as good as it used to be. Does this make sense to anyone? Has anyone else had a similar experience when they lost their inner skin?
Is this too much inner skin, not sure if I should get a revision
I was circumcised at 2 months old and I am curious about the amount of skin I have left and if it is tight enough, let me know if you think a revision would be worth it for a better result or if I should just leave it as it is
Let me split you in two with my thick fat alpha cock
Persistent Inner Foreskin Lymphedema After High Circumcision (Now Need Revision)
I was circumcised almost six months ago and specifically requested a high cut to preserve more inner foreskin. Unfortunately, I was not informed that retaining a larger amount of inner foreskin can significantly increase the risk of persistent postoperative lymphedema/chronic swelling. Despite being otherwise healthy, I developed permanent edema of the inner foreskin that has never resolved and now requires revision surgery to remove the chronically swollen tissue.
This is not just a rare theoretical complication. Persistent swelling of retained inner foreskin appears to occur in a substantial minority of high-cut patients — estimates around 20% have been reported in some discussions and surgical experiences. Patients considering a high circumcision should be clearly warned that preserving more inner mucosa may come with a materially higher risk of chronic edema, prolonged healing issues, cosmetic dissatisfaction, and possible need for revision surgery.