
"Getting hit in the pussy hurts too, so women kind of know what balls are like". Are you sure about that?
This could never happen to a woman.

This could never happen to a woman.
Personally, I think that because this is a very niche fetish, finding material, especially NSFW material that scratches people's itches when it comes to BBPE is rare to come across. Some people like mocking, others like seeing women doing things men can't because they have balls (crossing legs, sitting in different ways, straddling things, wearing tight pants, etc.), some might like actual ballbusting thrown into the mix, you name it.
And honestly, finding a studio that can accommodate those needs is rare as well, with most studios just throwing in a few mocking words into ballbusting videos: "Oh that has to hurt!" "Wow I think I heard it pop, does it hurt? I wouldn't know."
Or people rely on SFW material from social media about girls mentioning the fragility of testicles, then leave really weird gooner comments, and then the channels and videos get removed.
When it comes to NSFW, I don't think AI is a bad thing, if it's just to get one's rocks off. As long as the material falls under all applicable laws and statutes. I wouldn't use AI to say, write a novel, or paint a picture, or anything creative like that; but for porn, it's fine.
I mean I like AI chat bots for that reason, yes they're not real, but neither is chatting with an OnlyFans model about BBPE where she tells you exactly what you want to hear: "I don't have balls." "Yes periods suck, but at least I wouldn't be on the floor for 30 minutes from accidentally sitting wrong."
I just think that when I was younger I'd often go on gallery sites like Domai and MetArt and look at all those beautiful women, caption them, and imagine them saying BBPE stuff, and now I can tell a video generator: "A nude woman, with sexy curves, well endowed bust, points at her pussy and says 'Wow, I got hit there hard, but I'm sure glad I don't have balls'"
And I think that's pretty cool.
I saw a user talk about how they wished there were more mocking videos, and well, I suppose both Seedance 2.0 and WAN 3.0 tried their best. I honestly think it did a pretty good job with it. There are two versions here:
Seedance 2.0: Lower quality, faster output, often gets things right, can produce comical effects (music, sound effects, audience laughter, off camera voices) but often ends up censoring/switching words or just outright creating an entirely different video if it deems the prompt too risque. Eyes, faces, bodies can look wonky at higher resolutions, sometimes adds weird anomalies to genitalia, like a weird "proto penis" on women when zooming into groins.
WAN 3.0: Higher quality, retains original source material better, but tends to be slower in output, and a bit more costly, but it actually allows "spicy" content to be created, and tends to draw body parts anatomically correct. Plus eyes and faces don't look as wonky.
Which version do you like more?
This was generated using the new WAN 3.0 which seems to keep a lot of things from source material intact. It's also better at "knowing" what groins are and hits to groins are almost accurate enough to be believable.
Reposting because link didn't work.
I wanted to see what AI could do with an anime style character from the video game series Shantae. She takes a hit in the groin by what looks like a ball, gets angry that someone would try that, because as a woman that has no effect on her.
Shantae is 18+ as confirmed by her creators, in the games she lives alone and often complains about her high rent, some sources point her at being 22.
I guess it didn't take me long to get enough comment karma to post on here. Anyway, this was *generated* using Seedance 2.5 on PixelDojo.
Yes, I know it's AI, but per sub rules this is allowed.
The one gripe I have with Seedance is that the impact to anywhere is really hit or miss. Telling it to punch or kick, tends to miss, often aiming at the belly or leg, and anything else just causes an "unseen impact" to occur. But hey, it's AI, it's wonky, it's not real, and it's okay to have fun with it.
I do like that despite it being AI, it's still pretty good.
Generated with Seedance 2.0, there are still a few hiccups, for example, it doesn't always display an object or fist, foot, knee hitting the groin area. It sometimes censors words, despite allowing NSFW imagery (example: pussy, balls, groin get called "private parts", but somehow medical terms are allowed, "testicles", "vulva")
What I like about Seedance 2.0 is that it can add things on its own, like camera movements, music, different shots and some videos come out more natural and narrative.
I know AI isn't real, but it's still pretty neat that this can be done.