Sexual tales of magic underwear and silverware.

People keep inventing new ways to have sex without admitting they are having sex. Sometimes the invention is a contract. Sometimes it is a plank in a bed. Sometimes it is a spoon company.

What follows is one tour of the better specimens.

A marriage with an expiration date

The version that usually gets told as “Muslims can marry a woman for a weekend” is nikah mut’ah, and it is not “Muslims.” It is a Twelver Shia contract. Duration and dower are named up front. When the clock stops, the marriage ends by itself. No divorce. Children are legitimate. The woman observes a waiting period afterward. The term can be an hour or ninety-nine years. A weekend is only one possible setting.

Sunni schools treat mut’ah as forbidden, citing reports that Muhammad allowed it briefly and then banned it. Shia scholars say the ban was later politics, not prophecy. That argument is older than most nation-states and still running. Critics call the contract a religious cover for paid sex. Defenders call it a legal way to have a body without zina when a permanent household is impossible. Both descriptions fit, depending on who is holding the stopwatch.

Sunni worlds grew their own cousins. Misyar is a permanent nikah in which the wife waives housing, maintenance, or regular cohabitation. No built-in end date. Some jurists call it valid and spiritually cheap. ‘Urfi skips the civil registry and hopes the neighbors do not ask. Same itch: keep the sex inside a blessed sentence when ordinary marriage is expensive, delayed, or inconvenient.

Roses that do not smell like roses

The commercial world does the same trick with nouns. In older escort ads, roses meant dollars. “Bring roses.” “Eighty roses.” A dozen was a rate, not a bouquet. Men who arrived with actual flowers became a standing joke. Cops learned the code years ago. Calling a fee a flower does not turn a booking into horticulture. It only lets the sentence live on a website that bans the other word.

Mut’ah writes a term into a contract. Roses write a price into a metaphor. Different desks. Same human habit.

The Mormon file, which is three different files

Temple garments are the item outsiders call magic underwear. Endowed Latter-day Saints wear white two-piece underclothing as a private reminder of temple covenants. Official teaching is spiritual, not ballistic. Members generally find the nickname as charming as calling a kippah a magic hat. Some tell personal close-call stories. That is campfire talk inside the church, not a product claim. The garments are about memory. They get dragged into sex lists because distinctive underwear is irresistible to outsiders.

Soaking is the internet’s favorite Mormon sex act: penetration, then stillness. No thrusting, therefore—if you squint hard enough—no sex, therefore no broken law of chastity. Jump-humping is the sequel, in which a third person bounces on the mattress so the still couple receives motion as a gift. The Church does not accept the loophole. Researchers and a lot of current and former members say the practice is rare, fringe, or a joke that escaped the dorm. A few people insist they actually did it. A rumor can be oversized and still have a handful of practitioners. TikTok did the rest.

Bundling gets filed under Mormons because both live in the American “strict courtship” drawer. Historically it is older and broader. A courting couple spent the night in the same bed, clothed, often divided by a wooden board, a long pillow, or a sewn sack, while parents slept nearby. Dutch kweesten, Swedish nattfrieri, Alpine Kiltgang, colonial New England, Pennsylvania Dutch, later some Amish bed courtship. The theory was talk, warmth, and compatibility. New England pregnancy rates suggest the board was a suggestion. A bundling pillow is simply the soft edition of the plank.

One culture puts a reminder on the skin. One invents a definition of thrusting. One puts furniture between two people and calls it a date.

Oneida: everyone is married, then someone invents the flatware

If bundling is sex with a speed bump, the Oneida Community removed the bump and hired a scheduler.

John Humphrey Noyes founded a Perfectionist commune in Oneida, New York, in 1848, after Vermont tried to arrest him for adulterous fornication. Property was common. Children were raised in common. Adults lived in complex marriage: every man married to every woman. Exclusive pairs were selfish and got separated. A third party usually brokered the “interview.”

Birth control was male continence—intercourse without male ejaculation—arrived at after Noyes’s wife survived a string of brutal pregnancies. Later came stirpiculture, a committee deciding who should produce children. “Ascending fellowship” steered the young toward older partners, which placed Noyes near the front of the line with young women. For about thirty years the system worked as a going concern: farm, factory, choir, and a sexual roster.

Then the outside world arrived with ministers and statutes. In 1879 Noyes ended complex marriage and fled to Canada. Members rushed into ordinary weddings. In 1881 the commune became a joint-stock company. Traps and silk had already paid the bills. Spoons finished the job. Oneida Ltd. put community silver on middle-class tables for a century. The corporation later preferred that the free-love papers stay in the attic. The brand outlived the theology. That is a very American ending.

A few more rooms in the same house

The Unification Church, after its mass Blessings, put some couples through a chastening rite, a stretch of abstinence, then a scripted three-day consummation meant to rewind Adam and Eve. From outside it looks like liturgical choreography. From inside it is cosmology with a bed.

On Java, pilgrims have long gone to Gunung Kemukus on certain calendar days to have sex with someone who is not their spouse, beside a shrine, for luck. Orthodox leaders hate it. The mountain still draws a crowd. Ritual adultery with a parking problem.

Older still are claims of sacred prostitution, left-hand tantric sex used as a ritual technology, and European trial marriages “for a year and a day.” Historians argue about how much of the ancient temple-sex story is real. The impulse is not in dispute: if the act can be offered to a god, a season, or a contract, it is no longer merely Tuesday night.

The Shakers refused the body and ran out of Shakers

Then there is the opposite solution, executed with terrifying consistency.

The Shakers—United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Appearing—followed Mother Ann Lee across the Atlantic. God, they said, is male and female. Ann Lee embodied the Second Coming. Sex, including married sex, was the original sin. Salvation meant total celibacy. Brothers and sisters used separate doors, sat at separate tables, and did not touch. Children arrived as converts and as orphans the villages took in. Nobody was supposed to be made on the premises.

Celibacy did not kill them on contact. They grew while refusing to reproduce. At the mid-nineteenth-century peak a few thousand Believers lived in about twenty villages, famous for furniture, hymns, farms, pacifism, and a gender equality that made ordinary churches look sleepy. Then conversions thinned. Adopted children left. The ecstatic shaking cooled. A religion that asks you to surrender family, property, and sex needs a high spiritual voltage. When the voltage dropped, the cost stayed the same.

By 1905 there were roughly a thousand members. By this century the last living community is Sabbathday Lake in Maine, with a handful of people—two for a long stretch, later a third. The faith is not a legal corpse. As a people who replace themselves, it is over. Celibacy was the doctrine. Arithmetic was the verdict.

The pattern, which is the pleasure of the whole cabinet

Look at the shelf in one glance.
Mut’ah puts a timer on the marriage. Misyar keeps the marriage and deletes the housework. Roses rename the cash. Soaking tries to win on a dictionary. Bundling inserts a board and hopes. Oneida blesses everybody and later sells forks. The Shakers bless nobody and later sell museum tickets.
None of this is proof that religion is a con, or that lust is a tragedy, or that your grandmother’s silver is haunted. It is proof that people are ingenious when a rule and a body collide. Some communities legalize the collision. Some choreograph it. Some hide it under a flower. Some put a pillow down the middle of the mattress and call it courtship. Some declare the collision itself the Fall and wait, generation after generation, for new believers to walk in the door.

The weirdness is not that humans want sex. The weirdness is the architecture they will build around it, and how proud they are of the blueprints. Oneida’s blueprint became a brand. The Shakers’ blueprint became a quiet house in Maine. Both buildings are still standing. Only one of them still has to worry about grandchildren.

u/FromThisNight — 3 hours ago

Cuckolding and the “bull” dynamic

Cuckolding and the “bull” dynamic is one of the more common—and frequently misunderstood—male sexual fantasies and practices. Research by Justin Lehmiller and others shows that a substantial share of men (around 45% or higher in some surveys) have fantasized about watching their female partner have sex with another man. When it moves from fantasy to consensual practice, the roles are typically framed as the cuckold (the partner who watches, knows, or is told about the encounter) and the bull (the other man, often selected for traits coded as more dominant, athletic, or sexually confident).

Not every instance involves the same motives. Some versions emphasize humiliation and power exchange; others focus on pride, voyeurism, or the partner’s pleasure with little or no degradation. The related term hotwifing usually describes the pride/desirability version without the strong masochistic or BDSM overlay that defines classic cuckolding. Real couples often blend elements.

Core reasons men report (and research supports):

Voyeurism and “live porn.”

Many men are simply highly visual. Watching their own partner—the person they find most attractive—become aroused and have intense sex can feel like the ultimate personalized erotic film. The emotional charge of knowing her so well intensifies the visual and auditory stimulation.

Sperm competition (the biological angle).

Evolutionary psychology offers one of the more consistent scientific frames. When a man perceives (or imagines) that another man’s semen is present, several measurable responses can occur: stronger arousal, more vigorous thrusting, a larger ejaculate with a higher proportion of motile sperm, and a shorter refractory period. Studies (including work building on Baker & Bellis and later experimental work on competition cues) show that visual or cognitive cues of rival sperm reliably up-regulate male sexual response. In short, the body treats the situation as a reproductive contest and mobilizes accordingly. After the encounter, many men describe an intense urge to “reclaim” their partner—sex that feels unusually driven and satisfying. This mechanism does not require conscious evolutionary thinking; it operates as a physiological response that some men find intensely erotic.

Humiliation, power exchange, and masochism.

For a subset of men, the arousal centers on feelings of inadequacy, exclusion, or being “less than” the bull. Relinquishing the culturally expected dominant/possessive male role, eroticizing jealousy or emasculation, and experiencing psychological pain as pleasure are classic masochistic dynamics. Some describe it as an escape from the constant performance of traditional masculinity. Dirty talk, chastity, or the bull’s greater size/strength can amplify this. Importantly, this is usually carefully negotiated role-play, not an expression of genuine low self-worth in everyday life.

Compersion and partner-focused pleasure.

Some men derive genuine pleasure from their partner’s heightened arousal and satisfaction—especially if she experiences orgasms or intensity she does not always reach with them alone. Compersion (joy in a partner’s joy) can coexist with, or even replace, jealousy once trust and communication are solid.

Taboo, novelty, and adrenaline.

In a culture that still idealizes monogamy, deliberately crossing that boundary produces a strong mix of fear, risk, and excitement. The emotional intensity itself becomes erotic. Sensation-seeking personalities are over-represented among those who move the fantasy into practice.

Pride, status, and “showing her off.”

Related to candaulism, some men are turned on by the idea that other men desire their partner and that she is sexually confident and desirable. The husband’s ultimate “ownership” or continued primary bond can feel status-enhancing rather than diminishing.

Indirect or exploratory bisexual interest.

In interviews and surveys, a noticeable portion of men acknowledge that part of the charge involves proximity to another man’s body or semen (clean-up, shared space, etc.). This does not necessarily mean the man identifies as bisexual; it can function as a safe, partner-mediated form of male-male erotic contact.

Important distinctions and caveats

Motivations are rarely pure. A man may start with voyeurism or sperm-competition arousal and later discover that humiliation intensifies it, or vice versa. Fantasies that begin after discovering real infidelity sometimes convert the original distress into erotic material—a form of mastering a feared scenario.

Consent, communication, and aftercare are non-negotiable. Jealousy can spike even when the fantasy is mutual; clear boundaries, veto power, safer-sex agreements, and emotional check-ins matter more here than in many other kinks.

The dynamic can strengthen a relationship when both partners feel respected and desired; it can damage one when it is used to act out unresolved resentment or unequal power.

Cultural portrayals (especially porn) often lean heavily into interracial stereotypes, extreme degradation, or permanent hierarchy. Real-life couples frequently operate with more nuance, equality outside the scene, and mutual care.

In short, the appeal sits at the intersection of biology (competition responses), psychology (voyeurism, masochism, compersion), and culture (taboo-breaking). What looks paradoxical from the outside—arousal at the apparent loss of exclusive sexual access—can feel, for those who experience it, like a potent combination of visual intensity, physiological priming, emotional edge, and deepened connection with a partner. As with most complex sexual interests, the “why” is individual, layered, and best understood through honest self-reflection and open dialogue rather than a single explanation.

The illustration for this Academy lesson was AI generated.

u/FromThisNight — 7 days ago

Anal Sex: A Practical Guide

Anal sex is a distinct activity with its own anatomy, requirements, and risks. It is not automatically more intense or advanced than other forms of sex, and it is not something everyone will enjoy. For those who want to try it, the difference between a decent experience and a painful or messy one usually comes down to preparation, pace, and realistic expectations.

Preparation that actually matters

Talk first. Clear consent and stop signals should be established before anything begins. The receptive partner needs to feel free to slow down or stop at any point.
Have a bowel movement earlier if possible.

An empty or mostly empty rectum greatly reduces the chance of significant mess. A simple external wash with mild soap and water is usually sufficient. Aggressive internal douching is optional and often unnecessary—overdoing it can irritate the tissue and sometimes create more problems than it solves.

Use a lot of thick lubricant and plan to reapply. The anus does not self-lubricate. Silicone-based lubes tend to last longer than water-based ones. Avoid oil-based products with latex condoms.

Start small. A well-lubricated finger or small toy lets the external sphincter relax gradually. Rushing is the most common cause of pain and injury.

During the act

The receptive partner can help the outer muscle open by bearing down slightly, as if beginning a bowel movement. Deep, steady breathing helps more than force. Let the receptive partner control depth and speed.
Stop at sharp or burning pain. Mild stretching discomfort is common at first; sharp pain is a signal to pause or stop. Keep adding lubricant. Friction causes most problems.

Use a condom if there is any chance of fluid exchange or if you will move between partners or orifices. Never go from anal to vaginal penetration with the same condom or unwashed body part—rectal bacteria can cause infections.

What not to do

Do not force entry. Pressure will not make tight muscles open faster; it usually causes tears.

Do not use numbing creams or sprays. They hide the pain signals that protect against injury.

Do not skip lubricant or try to “tough it out.”

Do not assume experience with vaginal sex transfers directly. The tissues and muscle response are different.

Do not ignore clear discomfort.

The poop question

This is the concern that stops many people, and it deserves a direct answer. The rectum is usually not full of feces. If someone has had a recent bowel movement and is not constipated or urgently needing to go, the lower rectum is often mostly empty. Residual mucus or a small amount of material can still be present, which is why a towel underneath and a realistic attitude toward possible minor staining are useful. Complete zero-mess cannot be guaranteed every time, but with basic preparation the risk of a significant mess is low for most people.

If even a small chance of fecal contact is a hard stop for you, that is a valid reason to leave anal sex alone. Preference is preference. No technique guide can override a genuine aversion.

Afterward

Mild soreness or light spotting can occur the first few times. Persistent pain, heavier bleeding, or fever means stop and get medical attention if needed.

Bottom line

Good anal sex depends on patience, generous lubrication, communication, and accepting the anatomy as it is. When those elements are present, many people find it enjoyable. When they are missing, it is usually uncomfortable or worse. There is no prize for enduring pain or forcing yourself past a real turn-off.

u/FromThisNight — 15 days ago

The Hymen (and Virginity)

The Hymen: Anatomy, Myths, and Reality

The hymen is one of the most misunderstood structures in human anatomy. For centuries it has been treated as a seal of virginity, a barrier that must be broken, or a reliable indicator of sexual experience. None of these ideas hold up under medical scrutiny. What follows is a clear, factual account of what the hymen actually is, how it develops, why it varies so widely, and what (if any) biological purpose it serves.

What the hymen is

The hymen is a thin fold of mucous membrane tissue located at the entrance to the vagina (the introitus). It is part of the vulva. In most people it does not form a complete seal; instead it partially surrounds or borders the vaginal opening, usually leaving one or more openings large enough for menstrual blood to pass.

Its appearance is highly variable. The most common configurations in adolescents and adults are:

Annular (ring-shaped or circular) – tissue forms a continuous rim around a central opening.

Crescentic (half-moon or posterior rim) – tissue is present mainly along the bottom and sides, leaving the upper part open.

Septate – a band of tissue runs across the opening, creating two smaller openings.

Cribriform – multiple small perforations, resembling a sieve.

Microperforate – a very small single opening.

Imperforate – completely closed (rare, about 1 in 1,000–2,000 births; usually corrected surgically around puberty so menstruation can occur).

After childbirth the remaining tissue is often reduced to small tags called carunculae myrtiformes. Real hymens are rarely neat or uniform; thickness, elasticity, color, and exact shape differ from person to person and change with age, hormones, and activity.

Development

The hymen is a developmental remnant. In the embryo the vagina begins as a solid cord of tissue. As it hollows out (canalizes), a thin membrane often remains at the outer end. Openings normally form before or shortly after birth. The tissue is estrogen-sensitive: before puberty it tends to be thinner and more delicate; after puberty estrogen makes it thicker and more elastic.

Common myths

The idea that the hymen is a tight seal that must be “pierced” like the lid on a can of coffee is false. Most hymens already have openings at birth. Bleeding on first intercourse is neither inevitable nor proof of prior virginity. Many people experience little or no bleeding; others bleed from stretching of the tissue, from inadequate lubrication, or from minor tears in surrounding areas.

Physical activity, tampon use, medical exams, and even the natural changes of puberty can alter the hymen long before any sexual activity occurs. An “intact” hymen is not a reliable marker of virginity, and a stretched or torn hymen does not prove sexual experience.

Does it have a function?

No clear adult function has been established. The most plausible evolutionary hypothesis is that a partial membrane offered modest protection against fecal bacteria and debris during the prolonged period of human infant helplessness, when the vaginal environment and immune system are still immature. Once childhood ends, any such benefit largely disappears. In other mammals similar membranes exist (elephants, some whales, horses, etc.), supporting the view that the structure is an ancient developmental byproduct rather than a recent human adaptation engineered for a specific adult purpose.

In short, the hymen is best understood as a leftover of fetal development that may have had a mild protective role early in life and has simply persisted.

Surgical reconstruction (hymenoplasty)

Some people request surgical restoration of a hymen-like membrane for personal, cultural, or religious reasons. The procedure is minor and usually performed under local anesthesia as an outpatient operation lasting 30–60 minutes. If enough remnant tissue remains, the edges are freshened and sutured together with fine dissolvable stitches. If little tissue is left, a small flap of vaginal mucosa can be used to create a new partial membrane. Recovery typically requires four to six weeks without penetrative sex or tampon use. The reconstructed tissue will stretch or tear with subsequent intercourse, just as an original hymen would.

A clearer view

The hymen is ordinary anatomy, not a moral or diagnostic instrument. Its shape and condition say almost nothing definitive about a person’s sexual history.

Understanding its true nature removes a great deal of unnecessary anxiety, cultural pressure, and medical misunderstanding.

u/FromThisNight — 15 days ago

Masters & Johnson Sex Research

I’ve wondered how Masters & Johnson actually found people willing to fuck under observation in a lab in the 1950s–60s. So i asked Grok.

Here’s what the record shows:

They started with prostitutes. Masters interviewed around 145 of them in St. Louis because they were experienced, available, and willing. A small number were used for early physiological work. Those data were mostly tossed later because frequent sex had left a lot of them with chronic pelvic congestion, so they weren’t considered “normal.”

WTF is pelvic congestion?

After that they switched to regular volunteers. Word spread through the Washington University medical school and hospital. Subjects included medical students, nurses, faculty, hospital staff, graduate students, and local housewives. Virginia Johnson was especially good at recruiting women. They paid a modest fee (mainly so people would show up on schedule). About half the applicants got screened out — neurotics, pure thrill-seekers, or anyone who couldn’t reliably orgasm. The final sample for Human Sexual Response was 382 women and 312 men, mostly white and educated, many of them married couples.

Did strangers meet for the first time when they had sex in the lab? Sometimes yes. For a while they deliberately created “assigned couples” — unmarried men and women who didn’t know each other, paired specifically for the research. They wanted to see if the physiological responses of strangers were different from established partners.

Conclusion: basically the same. In some early sessions people even wore simple masks or hoods for anonymity. Most later work used real couples.

Were they given directions? Sort of. Subjects were eased into the room and the equipment. They were left alone first to get used to the space. The researchers explained what activity was being studied and what the machines would measure. Once things started, couples were generally allowed to do it their own way, though the cameras, wires, and knowing they were being watched obviously affected the atmosphere.

What happened to the films? They shot a lot — external color film and internal footage using a clear plastic phallic device with a camera and cold light that recorded inside the vagina. Eastman-Kodak reportedly agreed to keep it confidential. After the main research phase ended, Masters and Johnson destroyed most of the films, recordings, equipment, and notes to protect the volunteers’ anonymity. Almost none of the original research film is known to exist today.

Still wild to think about. Hundreds of people, some of them complete strangers to each other, having sex in a laboratory while scientists took notes and ran cameras… and then almost all the visual record was deliberately erased.

u/FromThisNight — 16 days ago

There’s a reason a lot of women say it feels different when you finish inside them.

Part of it is pure physics. The sudden heat, the volume, the way it coats and fills. That wet, claimed sensation is hard to fake with a condom. Some women describe a deep, low pulse afterward — mild uterine contractions triggered by the prostaglandins in semen. It’s subtle, but for many it registers as a lingering internal throb that can feel surprisingly good.

Then there’s the chemistry. Seminal fluid contains a mix of compounds that the vaginal walls can absorb: prostaglandins, various hormones, and other bioactive molecules. One older study found that women who regularly had unprotected sex reported lower depression scores than those who used condoms or weren’t having sex at all. The data is correlational and has been debated, but the idea that something in semen interacts with female physiology isn’t pure fantasy. The body is designed to take that fluid in and respond to it.

A number of women also report stronger or more satisfying orgasms when their partner actually comes inside them. Whether that’s the physical feedback of feeling him pulse and fill them, the psychological charge of being marked, or a combination, the preference shows up consistently in surveys. For some, the moment of internal ejaculation is the peak of the experience, not just the end of his.

All of that said — and this part matters — none of the interesting science cancels the real risks. Unprotected sex transmits STIs. HIV, gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, herpes, HPV, and the rest do not care how good the chemistry feels. If you and your partner are not both recently tested and mutually exclusive (or in a carefully negotiated risk-aware arrangement), the smarter move is still a condom. Pleasure is better when it doesn’t come with an unwanted infection.

But when the conditions are right and the trust is there, a lot of women will tell you the same thing: it just feels better with the real thing left inside.

The illustration for this lesson is AI generated.

u/FromThisNight — 16 days ago
▲ 1 r/AcademyOfSex+1 crossposts

The Coolidge Effect: Why Your Dick Wakes Up for Fresh Pussy

The Coolidge Effect is a real, documented biological phenomenon observed across a wide range of mammals (including humans). In short: a male who has fucked himself into temporary sexual exhaustion with one female will often get hard and ready to go again almost immediately when a new receptive female is introduced.

It’s not just “variety is the spice of life.” It’s a hardwired response that shows up in laboratory studies with rats, mice, sheep, cattle, and other species. Researchers will let a male mate repeatedly with the same female until he stops mounting her and shows clear signs of satiation. Bring in a different female in heat, and the male frequently resumes vigorous copulation within minutes. The effect is strongest when the new female is novel and sexually receptive.

The name comes from an old story about President Calvin Coolidge. He and the First Lady were touring a government farm. Mrs. Coolidge noticed a rooster mating repeatedly and asked how often that happened. The guide told her “dozens of times a day.” She said, “Tell that to the President.” When Coolidge heard it, he asked whether it was the same hen every time. Told it was a different hen each time, he replied, “Tell that to Mrs. Coolidge.”

Whether the anecdote is literally true or not, the name stuck, and the science is solid. The effect is thought to be driven by a combination of olfactory cues, visual novelty, and changes in neurotransmitter activity (particularly dopamine) that reset sexual motivation when a new potential partner appears. It makes evolutionary sense: a male who keeps trying with new females can potentially sire more offspring than one who stays loyal to a single partner after she’s already been inseminated.
Important caveats that keep this factual rather than pure fantasy:

• It does not mean men are incapable of long-term monogamy or that every guy will automatically lose interest in a familiar partner.

• Individual variation is huge. Some men show a strong Coolidge response; others show little or none.

• Women also show novelty effects in arousal studies, though the classic “Coolidge” framing focuses on the male pattern because it is more pronounced and easier to measure in animal models.

• Context, relationship quality, emotional connection, and individual psychology still matter a great deal in humans. Biology is not destiny.

So yes — the phenomenon is real. A well-fucked male can often get his dick hard again for a new set of holes even when the previous partner no longer does it for him in that moment. Nature is pragmatic, not romantic.

u/FromThisNight — 18 days ago

Ou new, sister website just hit 250 members in less than two months.

OK, this subreddit (which we started) has grown to 27,700 students and faculty members. The University of Hawaii in Mãnoa had 20,404 students in Fall 2025.

Come visit the website at https://AcademyofSex org ~ it’s totally free.

Two hundred fifty horny souls
Have found the place where knowledge rolls—
Not calculus or dusty tomes,
But how to make a partner moan.
Less than two months and already thick
With members ready, wet, and quick.
The subreddit’s older, bigger, true—
But this new site is fucking new.
So raise a glass (or something else)
To every filthy, eager self
Who joined the Academy’s growing ranks
And came here just to give (and take) their thanks.
Here’s to the next two-fifty more—
May every lesson leave them sore.
Class is in session. Pants optional.
Congratulations, you dirty animals.

u/FromThisNight — 22 days ago

See if you can figure out which Waikiki hotels I’m in

Photos were taken by my partner after I met with new friends.

u/FromThisNight — 23 days ago
▲ 3 r/AustralianPorn+2 crossposts

The new way to do dic ratings (and boobs, pussy, and ass)

I'm frequently asked to do dic ratings. And, I confess, I have some curiosity about my boobs and pussy.

So I built an online rating platform.

Totally free. Highest and lowest scores thrown out before the average — Olympic judging. One troll can't sink you; one friend can't inflate you.

Come play. The game is new (live today) so help us build the number of images, anonymously. Or come to judge. 18+

All part of the Academy. https://rate-me.academyofsex.org

u/FromThisNight — 25 days ago

My book is now available for download (as well as paperback & hardback)

I joined Reddit two years ago to draw attention to my 600 page erotic novel. We are now able to offer instant downloads - as well as the Amazon versions.

For more information, or to order, please visit https://fromthisnight.com

Mahalo. 🌺

u/FromThisNight — 28 days ago

Number of views surprises me

I occasionally look at post insights to see what people like, and what they find less interesting.

My Reddit post of my fucking a guy on Makua Beach in Hawaii had 486k views in 58 days. It has a way to go to catch my partner playing with me using his first vibrating cock ring on xHamster - 4,700,000 views, 12,100 likes.

I asked Grok to do the math to figure out how much cum that video may have generated.

About 12,300–12,400 liters (roughly 3,250–3,300 US gallons) of cum.

Here’s the quick math:
Views: 4,700,000

Assumed jerk-off rate: ¾ → 3,525,000 guys

Average ejaculate volume: ~3.5 ml (typical mid-range of the normal 1.5–5 ml)

3,525,000 × 3.5 ml = 12,337,500 ml
= 12,337.5 liters
3,259 gallons

Fun comparisons

That’s enough to fill about 16–17 standard bathtubs.

Roughly ½ to ⅔ of an Olympic swimming lane (or a very large hot tub).

If you lined up 1-liter bottles side by side, the row would stretch more than 12 kilometers.

If you prefer a more generous 5 ml average (closer to a full teaspoon), it jumps to about 17,625 liters / 4,650 gallons. Either way, that’s a serious load of load.

Happy Aloha Friday. 🌺🌺

u/FromThisNight — 28 days ago