u/Muted_Apricot_4640

I often hear about severe punishment for speeding tickets and stuff like that. Now if the Dom pays all the bills that makes sense. But if the bills are split, then the sub will pay for the ticket and the higher insurance premiums. Isn't that punishment enough,? It sure would be for me. If anything i would need conform not punishment. Yet many of you submit to severe punishment. This doesn't make sense to me. Please explian.

You have sex with a woman on a first date and then she was to slow down and get to know you better?

View Poll

When subs give a list of rule they must follow, text before leaving the house and arriving at some place is very often there, and if not then spanking (sometimes severe). A rule easy to forget and impossible to understand.

Why?? I mean I assume most of us don't live in war zones. And unless its late at night, sub was drinking, must drive home a fairly long distance. Why?

Taking the kids to school ten minutes away? Driving to the doctor 15 minutes away? Why?

I do think that people rack their brains to find rules that can easily be forgotten because they enjoy spanking under the guise of "discipline." Or is it way to foster submission?

Like if you prefer a maintenance spanking every week, are you still wanting a soft dom?

Not sure if this question is appropriate on a DD forum, mods please delete if it's not.

But this tends to often be paired with DD, at least when the woman is on the one being disciplined. It soundd hot in theory, and i would nor mind doing it ocassuinally, but some of these women are allowed one orgasm a month or one orgasm a year!

Supposedly it makes her more submissive and more eager to sexually please her husband, which i can imagine is true. However, I think for most of us subs we like submission because it turns us on and gives us better orgasms. And even though DD is about punishment and behavioral change, I think most of us are turned on by the spankings, and a big part of it is the kink and better sex for both dom and sub. So I kind of find it incredible that some women give up orgasm in the name of submission, because isn't that kinda the point?

Do the kids know that the sub is spanked or punished? Do they know that the HOH is the head of household, and final decion-maker?

To what extent does this extend to the kids. People today often really let their kids disrepect them/talk back to them (the kind of stuff that would get you smacked or at least punished in some way in previous generations.)

At the same time, the level of respect and the severity of punishment in your relationships is quite high. It would be odd if your kid could speak to dad in a less respectful tone than his wife.

Do you spank your kids? I know many people consider it to be abuse nowadays and it's illegal in some countries. But if it work for adults why not kids? I don't put much stock into psych studies. Psychology is barely a science and they can't even agree on most things among themselves (each faction has evidence that contradict some other faction). Kids today are worse off by every metric (school performance, independence, mental health). Lots of people will say kids can't consent to spanking like adults, but they can't consent to any other form of punishment eirher, or their forced schooling, or the values you instill in them, so I am not sure of the difference. If you do spank your kids does the HOH do it, as in wait until your father gets home type stuff?

Finally, do you want to pass on these values to your kids? Like would you prefer they had the dynamics you have because they work so well for you?

I hope these questions are ok to ask here.

Not sure if this is an appropriate post for this forum. If not, mods please remove. But I just watched it for like the fifth time, and it just shows such a perfect example of classical masculinity.

It came in 1942 and requires some historical understanding, that i didn't originally have, in order to fully glean the meaning it had for audiences which made it the ultimate classic.

But Humphrey Boghart and Paul Henreid do such a good job of portraying what make men masculine and attractive. They are strong characters with unbending wills. They have noble characters. Humphrey Boghart is more jaded, rough around the edges, but clearly has a soft heart inside that comes out whe it counts. Paul Henreid is noble through and through. They are in love with the same woman, noble in her own right, very well. They do what they believe is right fearlessly.

They are not confused about what manhood demands. I love it. Just thought I would share it.

ETA: I posted this because so many women today don't know what a real man is.