
Update on sourcing policy (again)
So first I want to apologize for flip-flopping on this, but I’m hoping if we don’t blatantly and conspicuously break Reddits sourcing policy on illegal drugs, we’ll get to stick around. (Yes unfortunately all of us law abiding, decent, god fearing patriots that were using this plant derived alkaloid therapeutically to improve the quality of our lives, and many times contribute more positively to society than we would otherwise, are now considered a scourge on the country, a worse person than someone selling lethal doses of fentalogs ( I actually don’t believe in skapegoating these drugs either, but I hope you get the point. I’m trying to make))
Anyhow with the recent banning of mgm 15, we are no longer allowed to discuss the matter of sourcing mgm 15 and related compounds. I’d like it if we refrain from even telling others to get it from dw. So a few finer points:
What molecules were recently banned ?
This has been a source of some confusion because multiple bills banning various opioids were all put out at about the same time and some of them having relationship with the other bans.
So
Mgm 15
Mgm16
Pseudo Indoxyl **
Sr 17018
Cyclorphine
14968
Spirochlorphine
ODSMT(desmethyl tramadol)
- [tianeptine pending ]
These were three separate rule proposals aimed at banning opioids. There is a fourth rule proposal targeting tianaptine but has not officially been scheduled yet.
4 opioid ban bills all created within a month of each other. This is an unprecedented move, and some of these chemicals have been available for quite some time. Some barely existed. I am personally disgusted at this campaign to completely criminalize, and therefore stigmatize opioids in such a harmful light. We see that there are relatively few deaths with these compounds as a result of people giving a known dosage and purity, with testing and consistent access.
There is a lot of outrage about 70HM which is completely valid. But there is something more broadly nefarious at play here.
As we have seen for reasons unknown to me, 70HM was given a 30 day comment window with 15 more days added. The bill containing MGM only had one day. The bill containing ODSMT only had one day. The bill containing tianaptine has an on going legal effort to save it as of now.
This is an unprecedented broad stroke to demonize opioids
I apologize for that tangent, but I say this to encourage our exploration of new analogs to fill the void. Thus, discussions about sourcing of deuterated versions of these compounds are permitted. The analog act has no scientific validity, and is complete nonsense if a person is trying to use it as a guide for what is legal or not.
And finally, because the intent of the law has left a carve out of “trace amounts” of **psuedo- we will consider anything that isn’t the main component of a dosage unit to be a trace amount. So don’t let the fact there may be pseudo in a dosage unit dissuade you from sharing a source about it. That decision for now will be left up to the vendors.
I encourage you guys to let lawmakers know that these laws are ridiculous, unnecessarily, arbitrary, undemocratic, and harmful to a vulnerable population of people with chronic pain, emotional disorders, those who are fighting addiction, and even those who are looking for a healthier alternative to more harmful recreational drugs like alcohol in a legal capacity.
Even if you are not a fan of tianeptine, I am just dropping this link for any who may like to check it out and potentially speak out against the constant banning & stigmatization of opioids.
TLDR; please no sourcing of controlled substances.
stop banning opioids or give us a decent, affordable, accessible agonist replacement therapy.
If there’s anything that got banned recently that I missed, please let me know.